I know, it sounds like something you’d do in an operating room or possibly to your car. No, I’m not a golden retriever or child in the middle of the vaccine schedule (common to titer testing).
They do titer testing on pregnant women. Yes folks, mainstream medicine conducts titer testing. I got my blood drawn the other day in my OB’s office. They checked my level of immunity to rubella. Apparently that’s a bad thing to have during pregnancy, so they wanted to make sure I was immuned to the disease.
First, I’d like for you to take my history into consideration. I was NOT breastfed, didn’t have 50 vaccines like kids now do, and got my shots 20 or so years ago. I’m a child of the 80’s. In order to be considered immuned to rubella, one must carry antibodies higher than 9. Mine were 208. Yes, 208. Consequently, five years ago during my other pregnancy, my level was 179. So, the tests are fairly accurate and if anything, time has only added to my immunity.
Here’s my question, CDC. If mainstream medicine is using titer testing to determine whether an adult holds immunity to a disease, why can’t we do this for our children before they’re over-vaccinated or considered “parasites” because some of us choose not to “beat a dead horse” by continually jabbing our children when it’s not needed?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)





Yes, great question! I've actually requested to have my eldest's titers drawn because his old doc lost his records and I have no clue what he has or hasn't had. Not that I'd give him any vax at this point. But it cracks me up that they act like they don't want to do it because it's "time consuming and expensive". Uh huh.
ReplyDeleteYeah, time consuming for them...their profits would go down considerably...
ReplyDeleteExcellent, excellent points Crystal.
ReplyDeleteOh yes, see they could never do that because then they would not recieve their precious money that they are hell bent on getting from vaccines!
ReplyDelete